Top 5 'Blameless-Postmortem' Collaboration Tools to try for developers turning production fires into learning moments - Goh Ling Yong
It’s 3:17 AM. A jarring alert rips through the silence, and your heart jumps. A critical service is down. The next few hours are a blur of frantic Slack messages, SSH terminals, and dashboard-staring. You and your team eventually wrangle the beast back into submission, and service is restored. Exhausted, you finally sign off as the sun begins to rise. The fire is out. But what happens next is what truly defines your team's engineering culture.
In a traditional, blame-oriented culture, the next day brings the dreaded "root cause analysis" meeting. Fingers get pointed, defensive explanations are offered, and the focus is on finding the person who "pushed the bad code" or "ran the wrong command." This approach is not only demoralizing but also incredibly ineffective. It discourages transparency and teaches engineers that the safest thing to do during an incident is to do as little as possible to avoid being the one holding the hot potato.
This is where the concept of a blameless postmortem revolutionizes the process. Popularized by companies like Google and Etsy, it reframes the entire goal. Instead of asking "Who is to blame?", we ask "What systemic factors, process gaps, or tooling issues contributed to this outcome?" It assumes everyone acted with the best intentions based on the information they had at the time. This shift turns a stressful failure into a powerful learning moment, strengthening the team and the system itself. But fostering this culture requires more than just a mindset shift; it requires the right tools to facilitate open, structured, and collaborative investigation.
Here are the top 5 collaboration tools that can help your team master the art of the blameless postmortem and turn production fires into invaluable learning opportunities.
1. Jeli.io: The Incident Analysis Storyteller
If your goal is to go beyond a superficial "what happened" and truly understand the complex interplay between your people, tools, and processes during an incident, Jeli.io is in a class of its own. It's less of an incident management tool and more of a dedicated incident analysis platform, built from the ground up to support deep, narrative-driven learning.
Jeli's core strength lies in its ability to help you construct a rich, detailed timeline. It integrates with tools like Slack, Zoom, and PagerDuty to pull in conversations, alerts, and key events automatically. From there, your team can collaboratively annotate the timeline, highlighting moments of confusion, effective communication, or critical discoveries. This process isn't about finding a single root cause; it's about understanding the how and the why behind the actions taken. It helps you see the incident from the perspective of the people who were actually in the thick of it.
This is a principle my colleague, Goh Ling Yong, often emphasizes: to truly understand a system's failure, you must first understand the human experience within that system. Jeli encourages this by focusing on "contributing factors" rather than blame. It provides a framework for identifying latent issues—like unclear documentation, a confusing UI, or gaps in monitoring—that created the conditions for the incident to occur. The output is not just a report; it's a story that provides context and drives meaningful, systemic improvements.
Pro-Tip:
Use Jeli’s "Opportunities" feature to tag specific moments in the timeline for further discussion. For example, you might tag a message where an engineer expressed uncertainty about a metric. The postmortem discussion can then focus on, "How can we make this dashboard clearer for everyone?" instead of, "Why did you misread the graph?" This keeps the focus on system improvement, not individual performance.
2. Incident.io: The Slack-Native Workflow Engine
For many teams, Slack is the command center during an incident. Incident.io leans into this reality by providing a seamless, Slack-native experience for managing an incident from declaration to resolution and, most importantly, through the postmortem. Its primary goal is to reduce cognitive load and administrative overhead, so your team can focus on fixing the problem and learning from it later.
When an incident is declared with a simple /incident command, Incident.io spins up a dedicated Slack channel, a Zoom bridge, and a status page update, and starts logging all channel activity. This automatic data collection is a game-changer for the postmortem. Instead of someone having to manually piece together a timeline from memory and scattered logs, Incident.io has already done 90% of the work. It captures key decisions, hypotheses, and actions as they happen.
After the incident is resolved, the tool prompts you to start a postmortem, automatically populating a document (in Google Docs, Confluence, or Notion) with the entire timeline, participants, and key metrics like time-to-detection and time-to-resolution. This automation removes the friction that often causes postmortems to be delayed or skipped altogether. By making the process easy and integrated into the tools you already use, Incident.io helps build the muscle memory for consistent, blameless reviews.
Example in Action:
Imagine a junior engineer posts a graph in the incident channel with the comment, "I think this is the problem, but I'm not sure what this metric means." In a traditional review, this might be overlooked. With Incident.io's timeline, this message is captured. In the blameless postmortem, this becomes a clear action item: "AI-123: Improve documentation and naming for the service_queue_depth metric." The focus is on improving clarity for the next person in that situation.
3. Confluence (with a Killer Template)
Sometimes, the best tool is the one your team already has. Confluence is ubiquitous in the corporate world, and while it's not a specialized incident tool, it can be an incredibly effective platform for blameless postmortems when paired with a strong, well-defined template and a disciplined process. The key is to shift its use from a static documentation repository to a dynamic collaborative space for learning.
The power of using Confluence lies in creating a standardized postmortem template that codifies your blameless principles. This template acts as a guide, prompting the team to think about systemic factors instead of individual actions. It ensures consistency across all incidents and makes the findings easily searchable and shareable across the organization. This democratization of knowledge is crucial for turning isolated incidents into organization-wide learning.
A great Confluence postmortem template should include sections that actively discourage blame. Avoid fields like "Root Cause" and "Person Responsible." Instead, use headings like "Contributing Factors," "Timeline of Key Events," "What Went Well," "Where We Got Lucky," and "Action Items." This structure forces the conversation toward a holistic view of the event. As Goh Ling Yong and I have discussed, the language we use shapes our thinking, and a well-designed template is a powerful tool for shaping a blameless culture.
A Sample Template Structure to Try:
- Summary: A high-level, one-paragraph overview. What was the impact, and for how long?
- Lead-up: What were the conditions just before the incident? (e.g., a recent deployment, high traffic).
- Timeline: A detailed, timestamped sequence of events, including detection, diagnosis, and resolution steps. Pull in links to dashboards and Slack conversations.
- Contributing Factors: A bulleted list of all the technical, process, and human factors that contributed to the event. Aim for at least 5-7 factors.
- Where We Got Lucky: What went right by chance? This helps identify hidden risks. (e.g., "The on-call engineer happened to have deep knowledge of this legacy service.").
- Action Items: A table of concrete, assigned, and time-bound tasks to address the contributing factors. Each item should have a clear owner and a link to a Jira ticket.
4. Notion: The Flexible All-in-One Knowledge Hub
Notion has become the go-to "second brain" for many development teams, and its flexibility makes it a fantastic choice for managing blameless postmortems. It combines the collaborative document editing of Confluence with powerful, user-friendly databases, allowing you to create a fully integrated incident analysis system tailored to your team's specific needs.
You can create a master "Incidents" database in Notion where each incident is an entry. This entry can hold all the details of the postmortem—the timeline, contributing factors, and discussion notes—within a single, expandable page. The real power comes from using Notion's database relations. You can link each incident to the specific services affected (from a "Services" database), the engineers involved (from a "Team" database), and, most importantly, the action items it generated (from a "Tasks" or "Projects" database).
This creates a powerful, interconnected web of knowledge. You can easily view all action items stemming from a single incident, or, conversely, look at a specific microservice and see every incident it has been involved in. This high-level view is invaluable for identifying patterns and prioritizing systemic fixes. For example, if you notice that the "auth-service" is repeatedly linked to incidents, it's a clear signal that it needs architectural attention, rather than just blaming the on-call engineer who happens to be responding each time.
Pro-Tip:
Create a standardized "Postmortem" template within your Notion Incidents database. Use the @ mention feature to link to specific documents, other pages, and people to create a rich, contextual report. Set up a board view for your action items database, with columns for "To-Do," "In Progress," and "Done," to make tracking follow-up work transparent and straightforward.
5. Rootly: The Automation and Metrics Powerhouse
Similar to Incident.io, Rootly is a comprehensive incident management platform that integrates tightly with Slack. Where Rootly particularly shines is in its deep automation capabilities and its focus on providing insightful metrics to help you understand your incident response process at a macro level. It's designed for teams looking to scale their SRE practices and use data to drive their reliability roadmap.
Rootly's workflow builder allows you to automate almost every aspect of the incident lifecycle. You can configure it to automatically create a postmortem document, assign the postmortem owner, schedule the review meeting in Google Calendar, and even create Jira tickets for all action items listed in the final report. This level of automation ensures that the postmortem process is not just an afterthought but a required, non-negotiable step in your incident workflow. It systematically removes human forgetfulness from the equation.
Furthermore, Rootly provides powerful dashboards that track key reliability metrics (MTTD, MTTR, etc.) and postmortem health. You can see how many incidents have completed postmortems, how many action items are outstanding, and which services are contributing most to your incident load. This data is critical for making a business case for reliability work. Instead of saying, "I think we should refactor the payment service," you can present a report showing, "The payment service has been involved in 40% of our SEV-1 incidents in the last quarter, generating 25 high-priority action items. Investing here will have the biggest impact on our overall stability."
Example in Action:
You can set up a Rootly workflow that automatically reminds the owner of a postmortem action item in Slack if the corresponding Jira ticket hasn't been updated in 7 days. This simple, automated nudge helps ensure that the valuable lessons learned during the postmortem actually translate into concrete improvements, closing the learning loop.
From Firefighting to Fire-Learning
The tool you choose is ultimately a means to an end. The real goal is to build a culture of psychological safety, continuous improvement, and collective ownership. Whether you opt for a specialized platform like Jeli or Rootly, or adapt a flexible tool like Notion or Confluence, the most important step is committing to the blameless philosophy.
Stop asking "who?" and start asking "why?". Shift the focus from the person who made the final mistake to the system that made that mistake almost inevitable. When you do that, production fires stop being a source of fear and anxiety and become one of your most valuable sources of learning and growth.
What tools or techniques does your team use for blameless postmortems? Share your experiences and favorite tips in the comments below—I'd love to learn from you
About the Author
Goh Ling Yong is a content creator and digital strategist sharing insights across various topics. Connect and follow for more content:
Stay updated with the latest posts and insights by following on your favorite platform!